Choosing a Rental Solution: Eight Criteria for the Demo

Three providers showcase three similar feature lists during a demo, and the differences only become apparent at the handovers. Features explain what a task can do, not how the process continues between tasks. Those who ask each provider the same questions across eight criteria and have the answers demonstrated directly in the system can effectively compare solutions.

Why do feature lists barely help with the selection?

Publishing listings, scheduling viewings, collecting tenant self-disclosures: many providers can do this, and their feature lists look accordingly similar. The differences lie elsewhere—at the handovers. What happens after the self-disclosure? Where is the result of the credit check stored? Who sees that a contract has not yet been approved? At these points, a process changes hands or applications, and this is where disruptions occur in daily operations.

Which types of systems exist in the real estate industry—from ERPs to portals to platforms for letting and sales—is outlined in the overview Digital solutions for the real estate industry. This article picks up from there: the type of solution has been decided, and the demos are scheduled. How a process is structured that is kept in one place from inquiry to handover is described in the cornerstone article Guided workflows in property management. Where handovers break first as portfolios grow is shown in Scaling the letting process.

What does a wrong decision cost?

The license is not the only cost factor. It becomes more expensive through data migration that ultimately requires manual cleanup, through duplicate maintenance in two systems because the new one never fully replaces what the old one could do, and through an onboarding process where workflows continue in parallel via informal requests. We do not provide specific figures here. However, the patterns are easy to verify: they are embedded in the questions regarding data migration, implementation, and exit capabilities further below.

How do you compare three providers fairly?

The same questions, the same process, the same protocol. Bring a real, anonymized case that deviates from standard scenarios and have each provider walk through it. A prepared click path highlights a product's best moments; bringing your own case reveals what happens when things get complicated.

Define which criteria matter most to you before the first demo. Those who weight criteria only after the third demo will base their evaluation on their impression of the provider they saw last. And note for each question whether the answer was demonstrated, merely explained, or sidestepped.

Which eight criteria belong in the demo?

The eight criteria are an editorial framework, not an industry standard. We are a software provider ourselves; these criteria focus on what can be demonstrated in a demo. The first four concern the process and the interaction between systems, while the remaining four cover implementation and operation. For each criterion, you will find two to three questions that you can ask every provider.

1. Process management within the case

Does the process remain in one place from inquiry to handover, or does it shift between portals, inboxes, spreadsheets, and folders? Can you configure checks that must be completed before the next step becomes available? Neither can be merely explained; it must be demonstrated. Not every provider enforces verification checks as prerequisites; ask for the solution they offer instead.

Questions for the demo:

• Show me a process from inquiry to handover. Where can I see the current status?

• Which checks prior to the contract can I configure, and what happens in the system if one of them is still pending?

• Which of these features are included in which edition?

Reliable is an answer that is demonstrated in the system and specifies limitations—for example, which checks can be configured and which cannot. Weak is an answer that stops at "Everything runs in one place with us" without opening an actual case.

With EverReal: A process remains largely in one place from inquiry to signed contract—and, if desired, through to handover; for QES, the digital signature is handled via Scrive. Starting with the Pro edition, the company defines which of up to four checks must be completed: applicant approval by an authorized person, sanctions list screening, credit check (SCHUFA; requires a separate SCHUFA account), and lease agreement approval prior to signing. The contract can only be initiated or sent once the configured checks are complete. These toggles are disabled by default; the company decides which ones to enable. To see what this looks like in EverReal, visit the Applicant Management and Contract Processing pages.

2. Integrations

The ERP remains the master data system for portfolio, accounting, and operating costs. What matters for the selection is whether data is entered once or twice. Entering data twice takes twice as long and eventually leads to discrepancies. The number of integrations says little about this. More important are direction and maintenance: Which data flows where, and who maintains the integration?

Questions for the demo:

• Which data flows in which direction, and how often?

• Who sets up the integration with my ERP, and are there one-off costs involved?

• Which fields are imported from my ERP, and which do I maintain directly in the solution?

Reliable is an answer that specifies a direction for each data type and designates who is responsible for updates. Weak is "We are integrated," without anyone being able to explain who maintains the integration.

With EverReal: EverReal is not an ERP and does not replace one; it complements it. EverReal offers integrations with several ERP systems, including Aareon Connect systems, Aareon PowerHaus, iX-Haus, and Wowiport; DOMUS is currently being piloted. Which data flows in which direction varies by system; we can demonstrate this specifically for your ERP. An example of an integration outside the ERP is Getmomo: you generate the lease agreement in EverReal, and the IBAN, BIC, and account holder of the virtual deposit account are populated in the contract before it is sent to the tenant. You track the incoming payment in Getmomo, not in EverReal. This integration applies to lease agreements with up to two private tenants and for properties in Germany, requires a separate contract with Getmomo, and is activated upon request; terms are provided during the consultation.

3. Audit trail within the case

Verification checks and documents belong where the case is managed, not in email inboxes. This applies equally to every provider. Why this matters for an auditable letting process is described in the related article. For the demo, one question is sufficient: What can I find within the case, and what would I have to piece together from emails?

Questions for the demo:

• Show me a completed case: which checks were carried out, and where can I find the results?

• How are changes to the contract tracked?

• Which documents are stored directly within the case, and which are kept outside?

Reliable is an answer that opens a real, completed case. Weak is a reference to an export format that has yet to be generated, or to a folder structure that someone must search manually.

With EverReal: The result of the sanctions screening is displayed as a status on the applicant record. The applicant's approval is logged with email and timestamp, as are SCHUFA queries (retained for 12 months) and, for contracts with enabled confirmation, the tenant's confirmations prior to signing with date and time. Contract changes are versioned.

4. Roles and tasks

A process needs assigned owners. Who is authorized to approve, who sees which tasks, and how is a case reassigned when team structures change? Pay attention to whether the answer points to a place in the system or merely an informal agreement within the team.

Questions for the demo:

• Who is authorized to approve applicants and lease agreements, and where do I configure this?

• Show me how to reassign a task to another colleague. Who gets notified?

• Which open tasks across the team can I see, and how do I access them?

Reliable is an answer that demonstrates ownership within the system and clarifies what is done manually and what is automated. Weak is a shared login or a shared mailbox where no one can later trace who took action.

With EverReal: Approvals for applicants and lease agreements are granted by an authorized user. Tasks can be assigned to a property, listing, or applicant, optionally with a due date and priority. The assigned person can be changed at any time, and the new owner is notified. Every user can view all tasks across the company.

> The questions for all eight criteria ready to fill out, a evaluation sheet per provider, and a matrix you can weight yourself: the evaluation matrix for your next three demos

5. Data migration

Existing portfolio data has to go somewhere. The question is who enters it, what format it arrives in, and what happens to records that don't match the new structure. This determines whether the solution runs with complete data on day one or if the first few weeks are spent manually entering data.

Questions for the demo:

• Who migrates my existing data, and in what format do I need to deliver it?

• What happens to data records that do not fit into the new schema?

• Where is the data migration scheduled in the project plan, and who is assigned to it on your side?

Reliable is an answer with clear ownership, delivery formats, and a process for handling exceptions, such as an error list for rework. Weak is "We'll figure that out then": the issue gets pushed to the day after launch, when no one has it on their schedule anymore.

6. Implementation and operations

A solution that no one uses does not replace a process. What matters is who provides the training, how long it takes, and who is available for support after go-live. Request the implementation plan as a document with milestones and assigned owners. Anyone who cannot provide one does not have one yet.

Questions for the demo:

• Who trains my team, in what format, and over what timeframe?

• How much time is expected from my team, and when?

• Who will be my contact person after go-live, and how can I reach them?

Reliable is an answer with names, timelines, and a documented plan. Weak is a kickoff meeting without anything further: that is an announcement, not a plan.

7. Pricing model

Whether pricing is calculated per transaction, per user, per unit, or as a flat rate determines how growth affects your costs. Calculate using your own volume, not the examples in the pricing sheet. EverReal's current pricing can be found on the pricing page.

Questions for the demo:

• How does the price change if my portfolio or my team grows by a third?

• What one-off costs apply, such as for setup or integrations?

• Which features belong to which edition or tier, and what does it cost to upgrade?

Reliable is an answer that provides thresholds and tiers in writing. Weak is "Growth is never an issue with us," without providing a tier or a number.

8. Exit capability

Evaluate the exit before you enter. Whether you can retrieve your data in a usable format is defined in the contract or nowhere at all. A verbal promise during a demo will not help when the original sales contact is no longer there.

Questions for the demo:

• In what format will I receive my data back, and within what timeframe?

• What does data export cost, and where is this stated in the contract?

• What notice periods and minimum contract terms apply?

Reliable is an answer that references a contractual clause: format, scope, timeline, costs. Weak is a vague promise made during a sales pitch.

When is EverReal not the right solution?

A thorough evaluation also includes knowing what a provider is not. For EverReal, the following applies:

• If you are looking for an ERP: EverReal is not an ERP and does not replace one; it complements it. Portfolio, accounting, and operating costs remain in the ERP.

• If you need pre-contractual checks: These checks are available starting with the Pro edition, and they are disabled by default.

• If you want to view incoming deposit payments directly in EverReal: You view these in Getmomo, not in EverReal.

• If you only handle a few transactions per year: In this case, examine very carefully whether the pricing model matches your transaction volume. Letting a continuous high volume of units involves different calculations than managing only a few transactions.

Conclusion

What matters most is what happens during handovers and whether the provider can demonstrate it. Defining the eight criteria before the first demo and asking every provider the same questions allows you to compare real capabilities instead of marketing brochures.

If EverReal is to be one of your three providers, evaluate us using the same questions: We will show you the answers live in the system.

Book a consultation

Sources

• EverReal product status regarding checks, tasks, and contract versions, as of October 19, 2026 (internally confirmed by Product Management).

• EverReal product status regarding Getmomo integration, as of October 15, 2026.

• EverReal Editorial Team: Digital solutions for the real estate industry, October 19, 2026.

• EverReal Editorial Team: Auditable letting, August 30, 2026.

FAQ

Which criteria are crucial when selecting letting software?

Eight criteria: the process including its verification checks, integrations, the audit trail within the case, roles and tasks, data migration, implementation and operations, pricing model, and exit capability. Feature lists are of little help because the critical differences emerge at the handovers between process steps. For each criterion, prepare two to three questions to ask every provider during the demo and have them demonstrated live in the system.

How many providers should you compare?

Three is a practical framework: enough to compare effectively, yet manageable enough to go through the same questions thoroughly with each provider. It is important that all providers demonstrate the same scenario using the same data, that you determine the weighting before the first demo, and that someone takes detailed notes.

What belongs in a demo that can be objectively compared?

A real, anonymized case brought by you instead of a pre-configured click path, the same questions for all providers, and the request to demonstrate every answer live in the system. Note for each question whether the answer was shown, merely explained, or sidestepped.

When is EverReal not the right solution?

EverReal is not an ERP and does not replace one; it complements it: portfolio management, accounting, and operating costs remain in the ERP. Pre-contractual checks are available starting with the Pro edition and are turned off by default. In EverReal, tasks are reassigned manually. Organizations with only a few transactions per year should verify whether the pricing model aligns with their volume.